Monday, February 16, 2015

Philosophy of History






One of the challenges a historian faces is how history should be studied. The biggest obstacle someone faces when looking at the past is avoiding a biased interpretation. Different historians have different interpretations of the past. This does not necessarily mean that only one of the historian’s interpretations is correct, it only means that they each see the past in different ways.  For someone hoping to become a historian, one of their first mistakes is believing that they need to have some sort of historical philosophy before they begin their research. By having a preset agenda, a historian is more likely to provide a biased interpretation. In order to study history, all historians must leave any of their personal biases out of their interpretation. History is the study of the past and not the study of the past through the filter of the present. A historian needs to acknowledge that they have certain biases in order to prevent skewing history. 





As a Christian, I believe that in order to provide an unbiased interpretation of history, I need to look at history with a Biblical worldview. Every part of the past is history. As a believer, the creation of the world is a historical act as well as the creation of man. Unlike man, God’s laws are absolute. Different historians have different views on different historical figures. By using God’s law, I can study history without using my own views of right or wrong. Whether a person’s acts are right or wrong is not based on my personal views of right or wrong, but rather through God’s view of right or wrong. By doing this, I avoid creating skewed views of historical figures, and do what all historians should do, study the past with an unbiased interpretation.